为了证明我不是在摸鱼，放一段现在正在写的review

    其实写也不难，但是为了保证质量还是等我搞定眼前的这点事情再说。

    这点东西是objective of research，这段没什么实际内容给人看看也无关痛痒。

    the objective of this project is to develop an efficient， robt， adaptive， self-learng syste by tegratg neural chaniss that govern dynaics at ultiple spatial-teporal scales as learned fro theoretical neuroscience

    顺便摘抄几句 ore is different里面的段落，也是本书的指导思想：

    a third sight is that the state of a really big syste does not at all have to have the sytry of the ws which govern it  fact， it ually has less sytry the outstandg exaple of this is the crystal: built fro a substrate of atos and space aordg to ws which express the perfect hooneity of spaces the crystal suddenly and un- predictably dispys an entirely new and very beautiful sytry the neral rule， however， even  the case of the crystal， is that the r syste is less sytrical than the underlyg structure would est: sytrical as it is， a crystal is less sytrical than perfect hooneity

    （对称性破缺第四卷会非常详细地讨论）

    。。。

    for another exaple， biology has certaly taken on a whole new aspect fro the reduction of ics to biocheistry and biophysics， which will have untold nseences  it is not true， as a recent article would have it (7)， that we each should “cultivate our own valley， and not attept to build roads over the ounta rans  beeen the sciences“

    （不同层次的学科应该应用不同的研究方法）

    。。。

    the arrogance of the particle physik cist and his tensive research ay be behd  (the disverer of the positron said “the rest is cheistry“)， but we have yet to rever fro that of  olecur biologists

    （粒子物理学家觉得只有粒子物理是物理）

    。。。

    arx said that antitative differences bee alitative ones， but a dialogue  paris  the 1920s sus it up even ore clearly:

    fitzrald: the rich are different fro

    hegway: yes， they have ore oney

    （辩证唯物主义）

    还是建议去读原文献，名字就是ore is different。

    老是有人问我为什么不翻译，首先因为这句话不太好翻译，其次这么着名的思想看看原文才能理解。